Evaluating Information

...the presence of inaccurate and biased information on the Internet is not our primary problem.
The information and points of view have not really changed, it is the tools that have changed.

David Warlick in
Evaluating Internet-Based Information: A Goals-Based Approach

boys and computer

Evaluating Information

  • Use specific criteria to determine the legitimacy of sources
  • Evaluate resources based on relevance and reading level
  • Determine different points of view presented in two pieces of information on the same topic
  • Distinguish between bias, opinion and fact

In the article Critical Evaluation in the Collaborative Era, Kathy Schrock asks How do we teach critical evaluation of information when we have no way to determine authority? The focus in this article is on the issues and difficulties that arise in determining the 'research worthiness' of information in a wiki world.

Articles and Checklists

Better Read That Again: Web Hoaxes and Misinformation

This article differentiates and discusses differenent kinds of misinformation: counterfeit sites, parodies and spoofs, ficticious, questionable, malicious, product sites and subject specific misinformation sites. It also offers a number of sites that track internet misinformation including Snopes.

BBC interview with Tara Brabazon - "Google is white bread for the mind" - article in Times Online. - both of these may be time sensitive and therefore at some point the links may be broken.

Google is “white bread for the mind”, and the internet is producing a generation of students who survive on a diet of unreliable information

Teacher Helpers: Critical Evaluation Information - a collection of articles and evaluation checklists available from Kathy Schrock

Popular MicroModules on Evaluation from the 21st Century Information Fluency Project:

Hints About Print
This is an interactive tool that takes students (grade 3 - 5) through a processing of determining if a non-fction book is the best resource for their research. Once students have viewed the online demo they can print-out a fillable PDF and evaluate their own non-fiction book.

Quality Information Checklist - uses imaginary examples, quizzes and puzzles to allow young people (grades 3 - 7) explore for themselves the concepts around information quality. Many of the examples are health related, but the concepts can be used with any subjects that require information skills.

Fact or Folly: Evaluating Online Information - from Media Awareness Network

Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask - uses critical thinking skills, a series of specific questions, and techniques to provide a strategy for determining if a website can be trusted.

Online Evaluation Tools

Digital Index Card - a web-based tool for collecting and evaluating Net information. It consists of six forms that ask questions of the researcher, all designed to collect content and to help the researcher make decisions about the appropriateness of the information. As student input pertinent information about the source they asked questions which relate back to their research goal e.g. What aspect(s) of the author's or publishing organization's background helps you accomplish your goal?

Evaluation Wizard from 21 Century Information Fluencey - as students enter their evaluation notes for author, publisher, objectivity, date, accurancy and evidence they are provided with prompts about what to look for within the web site they are evaluating.

A WebQuest about Evaluating Web Sites : from Joyce Valenza for grade 9 - 12 students (Note - last updated in 2001 - links may have to be updated)

Applying Reading Comprehension Strategies to the Evaluation Process

computer reading Critical Evaluation: Scary Research Findings Prompt New Internet Reading Strategies

Julie Coiro presents five activities associated with the online reading tasks that research suggests are particularly challenging for students who read to learn on the Internet. Each activity is accompanied with pertinent questions and relevant web sites.

  • evaluating relevancy - reading search results
  • evaluating reliability- investigating the author
  • evaluating reliability - investigating the validity of the web site
  • detecting bias - separating fact from opinion
  • detecting bias - developing a healthy skeptism

A Think Aloud to Model Online Reading demonstrates how to use reading comprehension strategies to read, question and ultimately evaluate the relevance and validity of a web page. From: 21 Century Literacies

Researching a Web Page Web Page Exercise - using Treaty 6 students respond to a number of questions which focus their reading on each part of the Web page. (From - Elgin Wyatt, NBCHS)

From Alan November

Our students must understand the architecture of the internet to be able to effectively evaluate the information they find.

How to Read a Web Address - The first step in learning the grammar of the Internet is to read URLs closely.

WayBack Machine - Want to see the history of web site? Take a trip through time with the Wayback Machine.

How to Find the Publisher of a Website using EasyWhoIs

Beyond the Checklist - using contextual analysis to evaluate web pages

contextual evaluation diagram Student Web Page Evaluation - a blog post that describes a successful lesson in which the teacher asks the students to use the comparison method. This requires requires the researcher to compare different sources and different types of sources in order to select the most useful.

Diagram from U Arizona Information Literacy: Evaluating Web Resources

Evaluating Blogs and Wikis

Live Journal logo Edublogs logo blogger logo wordpress logo

21 Century Information Fluency presents a number of resources that can be used to understand how to evaluate web 2.0 resources especially blogs.

A podcast (10:36 minutes) with Joyce Valenza points to key tips and ideas about what to look for when using blogs for research.

In Joyce Valenza on Evaluating Blogs Joyce says,

Blogs are essentially primary sources and can provide lively insights and perspectives not documented by traditional sources. They compare in some ways to a traditional interview, with the speaker controlling the questions. Ripe for essays and debate, blogs present not only the traditional two sides of an issue, but the potentially thousands of takes. And those takes take less time to appear than documents forced through the traditional publishing or peer review process. Blogs allow scholars and experts written opportunities to loosen their ties and engage in lively conversation.

This article from the 21Century Fluency Project provides an overview of the key things to look for in a blog as well as a well designed rubric for evaluating the legitimacy and usefulness of a blog.

Web 2.0 and Bias

It is essential to consider who is creating all this information and whether there is any real substance to back up the ideas and opinions that anyone can easily publish on the Internet.

Evaluating Wikis from: Information Fluency Meets Web 2.0 PowerPoint by Joyce Valenza

  1. What is the purpose of the collaborative project and who began it?
  2. How many people appear to be involved in editing the wiki?  Does it seem that the information collected is improved by having a variety of participants?  How heavily edited were the pages you plan to use?
  3. How rich is the wiki?  How many pages does it contain?
  4. Does the project appear to be alive?  Are folks continuing to edit it?
  5. Does the information appear accurate? Can I validate it in other sources?

 

Evaluating email

email

How to recognize an email hoax

The following five scenarios describe most email hoaxes:

  • A warning of a new virus that you should send on to everyone you know.
  • A warning of a scam that you should send on to everyone you know.
  • A petition to help the needy or some cause that wants you to foward it on to those who might be interested.
  • A get-rich-quick scheme that claims if you forward on the message you'll receive money for each time it's forwarded.
  • A claim that for each email sent someone in need will be helped by another organization.

Good email practices include:

  • don't open files from strangers or files that you aren't
  • expecting, don't give out your email or IM address or personal
  • information, don't reply to spam,
  • delete junk e-mails messages without opening them,
  • don't forward chain e-mail messages,
  • don't buy things advertised through email.

Tips for dealing with email hoaxes and to avoid viruses.

Snopes the best source for factual information about rumors

Truth or Fiction.com - your email reality check 

Hoax-Slayer is dedicated to debunking email hoaxes, thwarting Internet scammers, combating spam, and educating web users about email and Internet security issues.

Lesson Plan: Don't be fooled by a photograph from National Geographic

In this lesson, students will study images that we altered digitally, to create a desired effect. Students will discuss how a photograph conveys information, and how changing that photograph can change its message. This lesson plan is based on the National Geographic News story, "Shark 'Photo of the Year' Is E-Mail Hoax," which covers an urban legend based on a doctored photograph.

Shark Attacks Helicopter